Use case discovery
Assess workflows and identify where generative capabilities could serve a defined business need.
- Workflow and opportunity review
- Use case priorities and feasibility
- Prototype scope and success measures
Identify and evaluate generative AI use cases for knowledge access, drafting, summarization, and other defined tasks. Prototype the application and plan its data connections, integration, and human review.
Evaluate the workflow and source information, test a focused application, and review output quality. Define the system connections and human review needed for wider use.
Assess workflows and identify where generative capabilities could serve a defined business need.
Test a focused application and examine the relevance, quality, and limits of its outputs.
Adapt an approach to the task, including custom development or fine-tuning where justified.
Plan and implement how the application connects to existing systems and the people who use it.
Turn a defined task into an application your team can evaluate, using relevant information and clear expectations for human review.

Explore and test a generative workflow for knowledge access, drafting, summarization, or another task with a clear purpose.

Identify the sources, inputs, and system connections that can make the application useful within your business context.

Evaluate generated outputs against the intended task and define where people need to check, approve, or refine them.
Select a workflow, build a prototype, and test outputs against agreed criteria. Refine the approach and integrate the application where included in the engagement.
Review the task, users, source information, and intended outputs.
Build a focused version to test the approach in context.
Review output quality, limitations, and human oversight needs.
Connect the agreed application to its workflow and document its use.
Generative applications need relevant source information, output evaluation, and human review suited to the intended use.
Choose a workflow where generated content or answers have a practical purpose.
Determine which approved sources and context the application needs to use.
Define quality checks and human review for the intended task.
Consider integration, costs, and operating responsibilities before extending the application.
Begin with a defined task, accessible source information, and clear criteria for evaluating generated outputs.
Explore a workflow that helps teams retrieve useful answers from approved information sources.
Generate first drafts from relevant inputs while keeping people responsible for approval.
Help teams work through lengthy documents or feedback with outputs they can verify.
Generate and compare design or content options as inputs to a human creative process.
Answers about scope, existing systems, and delivery requirements.
No. The approach should follow the task. Existing models, application configuration, or adaptation may be suitable; custom training should have a clear justification.
Start with a defined workflow, accessible source information, an owner, and an output that can be evaluated. Discovery helps compare options and identify constraints.
Evaluation uses representative examples and agreed criteria such as relevance, completeness, and accuracy. Human review requirements depend on the task and the consequences of an incorrect output.
The approach depends on the available sources, access permissions, handling requirements, and integration scope. These are reviewed before implementation.
Not automatically. Prototype, integration, deployment, and operating responsibilities are agreed explicitly so the next stage is clear.
Share the workflow, source information, and intended outputs. We can help define a use case and test its feasibility.